Gemini's performance in Indonesia: Why is it still lagging behind ChatGPT?

Jakarta – Gemini's performanceAs a large language model (LLM) developed by Google, it has become a hot topic among technology users in Indonesia. Since its launch, many have compared it directly with OpenAI's ChatGPT. However, a consensus has emerged in some digital communities: Gemini often feels suboptimal when processing instructions in Indonesian, raising questions about the maturity of its technology for the local market.

Although on paper Gemini offers a range of advanced features, including multimodal capabilities integrated with the Google ecosystem, the user experience in Indonesia shows a different story. Common complaints include answers that are less contextual, a rigid sentence structure, and a failure to understand nuances or complex commands. This phenomenon certainly poses a serious challenge for Google in winning users' trust amid the dominance of its more popular competitors who were already established.

Why is Gemini's performance considered not yet optimal?

Competition in the field of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is heating up, with Google and OpenAI as two giants competing fiercely. The presence of Gemini is expected to be Google's answer to challenge ChatGPT's hegemony. However, those high expectations seem not to have been fully met yet, especially for users who interact using the Indonesian language.

The main challenge faced by every AI model is its ability to understand not only language, but also cultural context, idioms, and local communication styles. This is where.Gemini's performanceis often considered left behind. Users report that the responses produced sometimes feel like a raw translation from English, losing the naturalness that actually becomes one of ChatGPT's main strengths. This raises the suspicion that Gemini's training dataset may not be balanced in representing the linguistic richness of Indonesia.

Limitations of Indonesian training data.

One of the fundamental factors that influenceGemini's performanceis the quality and quantity of training data. The AI model learns from billions of texts and code fed to it. If the majority of that data is in English, then its ability to reason and generate text in other languages, such as Indonesian, will inherently be limited. This has a direct impact on AI's understanding of instructions that contain elements of locality.

For example, commands that use popular abbreviations, informal phrases, or proverbs are often misinterpreted. Gemini may fail to grasp the true meaning, and then provide an answer that falls short of expectations. On the other hand, ChatGPT, which has been exposed longer to global user interactions including those from Indonesia, is believed to have a more diverse data corpus, enabling it to learn more variations of language and context.

This limitation is not only about vocabulary, but also an understanding of sentence structure that is commonly used in everyday conversations. Meanwhile, Indonesian has varying levels of formality, ranging from formal language to slang. The AI's inability to distinguish this context often produces outputs that feel awkward and irrelevant, which ultimately reduces user satisfaction.

Contextual Issues and Local Nuances

Another problem that often arises is Gemini's failure to capture nuances. Language is not merely a string of words, but also a medium for conveying emotions, humor, and sarcasm. Linguistic features like these are very difficult for machines to learn if they are not supported by adequate data. Users who try to give creative or poetic commands in Indonesian often find the results unsatisfactory.

As a comparison, several user analyses indicate that ChatGPT is superior in creative writing tasks and in more natural conversational interactions. This indicates that the OpenAI model may have undergone a more intensive fine-tuning process for a variety of languages, including handling requests that are subjective and require a 'sense of language'.

In addition, the understanding of the current context, such as viral news or social media trends in Indonesia, is also an area where Gemini needs a lot of improvement. Without this capability, AI would only function as a machine that answers static information. In fact, modern users expect AI that is dynamic and relevant to the developments of the times, a challenge that AI developers around the world continue to strive to solve.

Comparative Analysis: Bug or Learning Curve?

Looking at the various shortcomings that exist, a fundamental question arises: whether the problem lies withGemini's performanceThis is caused bybug(technical error) or simply part of the normal learning curve for a new technology? The answer is most likely the combination of both. Every AI model released certainly has areas that need improvement based on feedback from a large number of users.

On the one hand, some inconsistencies in Gemini's responses could be.bugthat can be fixed through software updates. For example, unnecessary repetition of words or the inability to comply with negative instructions (“do not mention the word X”). However, on the other hand, the greater challenge lies in the learning process to understand the complexity of the Indonesian language, which requires a very large amount of time and data.

User Reports and Problem Identification

Various online discussion forums and social media are filled with user reports that compare the output of Gemini and ChatGPT forpromptthe same. From there, several problem patterns that are frequently reported can be seen. One of them is Gemini's tendency to give answers that are too general and lack depth, as if unwilling to take the risk of providing a more incisive analysis.

The rigidity in following the requested format also becomes a complaint. For example, when users request output in a table format or bullet-point format with a specific structure, Gemini sometimes fails to comply with it precisely. This is considered a setback for users who rely on AI for specific productivity tasks. These reports, although anecdotal, provide a clear picture of the areas Google needs to prioritize.

As part of technology development, Google itself actively collects feedback for improvement. In its official documentation, Google acknowledges that the model's capabilities can vary across languages and continues to work to improve them. Users are encouraged to providefeedbackimmediately when you find an answer that is inaccurate or unsatisfactory.

Google's Roadmap for Improving Language Models

Google did not stay silent in the face of this challenge. The tech giant has announced an ambitious roadmap for Gemini, including a commitment to deepen its support for more languages. According to various official sources fromGoogle AI, future updates will focus on improving reasoning abilities, accuracy, and understanding of cultural context.

One of its strategic steps is to expand the training data set to include more high-quality Indonesian-language text sources. In addition, Google also invests in techniquereinforcement learning from human feedback(RLHF) customized for the local market, where humans provide direct evaluations of the quality of AI's answers, helping the model learn faster.

Ultimately, the competition between Gemini and ChatGPT will spur faster innovation in the AI industry. For users in Indonesia, this is good news. As competition tightens, so does the effort that developers will devote to refining their products to make them more relevant and reliable for local needs.

AlthoughGemini's performanceIn Indonesian, it currently still shows several weaknesses compared to its competitors; it is important to remember that this technology is still in an evolutionary stage. The challenges surrounding training data and the understanding of local nuances are real obstacles, but not impossible to overcome. With the resources and commitment Google has, Gemini's prospects of becoming a more reliable AI tool for Indonesian users in the future remain wide open.

To stay up to date with the latest developments in AI technology and other in-depth analyses, be sure to keep reading other interesting articles only at Insimen.