Global AI Agency

Global AI AgencyIt became the main highlight of the artificial intelligence conference in Shanghai after Chinese Premier Li Qiang officially proposed the formation of a new international institution that would coordinate AI development and regulation. The proposal marks a major step by Beijing in its efforts to shape global governance of technology that is increasingly influencing the world's economy and geopolitics.

Li Qiang emphasizes that without an inclusive global framework, AI has the potential to become an 'exclusive game' that is controlled only by a handful of countries and large corporations. He calls on all parties to work together to ensure that the development of this technology can provide broad benefits for humanity, not only profits for the largest holders of the technology.

Global Challenges in the Midst of Technological Competition

The proposal to establish the Global AI Body emerged amid the intensifying competition between the United States and China in the field of artificial intelligence technology. Both countries are currently competing in research, chip development, and the use of AI in the economic and defense sectors.

The U.S. government previously imposed export restrictions on advanced chips to China, including chips used in training large AI models. This step is said to be aimed at safeguarding national security, but Beijing regards the action as actually hindering global collaboration and widening the technology gap between countries.

The US–China competition in the AI arena

The competition between these two world economic powers is not only taking place in the economic field, but also in the ideological arena and AI-related public policy. While Washington pushes an approach based on human rights and data security, Beijing seeks to emphasize the importance of digital sovereignty and national control over data and algorithms.

Several analysts assess that this proposal for a Global AI Agency could become a new diplomatic strategy for China to strengthen its influence in the international arena, especially among developing countries that want to participate in the AI revolution but lack robust technological infrastructure.

Potential Support from Developing Countries

Many countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America are predicted to warmly welcome this Chinese initiative. For them, the existence of the Global AI Body can be a forum to channel aspirations and to access technological knowledge that had previously been monopolized only by large Western companies.

In addition, the proposal aligns with global efforts that have been undertaken by organizations such as the United Nations (UN), which previously encouraged the formation of an 'AI Advisory Body' to provide recommendations on ethical policy and governance.

Goals and Vision for the Establishment of the Global AI Body

According to an official statement released by the Chinese government,Global AI AgencyIt is expected to function as an international coordination platform that governs ethics, safety, and transparency issues in the development of artificial intelligence.

Li Qiang emphasized that this organization is not intended to replace the existing international institutions, but rather to complement and strengthen cooperation among nations.

Promoting collaboration and AI ethics

China believes that AI developed without ethical oversight can pose serious risks, ranging from algorithmic discrimination to misuse for military purposes. Therefore, Beijing calls for global standards that balance innovation and responsibility.

This step has attracted widespread attention from conference participants in Shanghai, including representatives from industry and international academics. Several parties view the idea as a proactive step that could encourage multilateral dialogue on sensitive issues such as data privacy and technology surveillance.

Implementation Challenges at the Global Level

However, the formation of a new global institution is not without obstacles. Many countries remain wary of political dominance in such a structure, especially if the initiative is led by China. There are concerns that the standards produced may reflect certain interests and undermine global balance in AI policy.

Observers also highlight the need for broad involvement from the private sector and civil society so that the institution truly represents global interests, not just the government's interests.

Reaction of the International Community

Reaction to the proposalGlobal AI Agencyvarious. European countries, which had previously designedEU AI Act, stating that China's idea needs to be studied further so that it does not overlap with the legal framework that has been in place.

Meanwhile, several Southeast Asian countries, including Indonesia, welcomed the idea with caution but were open to the potential for collaboration. Indonesia itself is currently developing national AI ethics guidelines throughMinistry of Communication and InformaticsandNational Research and Innovation Agency, which is in line with the principles of transparency and global accountability.

Support from Academics and Industry

Several technology experts and international academics see the positive value of this idea. Professor Kai-Fu Lee, a Chinese AI figure, believes that cross-border collaboration is the key to AI developing safely and ethically.

Large companies such as Huawei and Baidu also support the idea of forming a global body because they believe it could create parity in international regulations that have long been viewed as biased against non-Western companies.

The stance of the United States and its allies

On the other hand, officials in Washington expressed skepticism about the proposal. They assess that the formation of a new body is at risk of being used to promote an AI governance model that is not aligned with the values of democracy and freedom of expression.

However, some parties in the United States also acknowledge the importance of global coordination in preventing the misuse of AI, especially in the context of deepfakes, cybersecurity, and disinformation that could threaten global political stability.

Strategic Impact on the World of Technology

IfGlobal AI AgencyFully formed, this step can transform the global regulatory landscape for technology. The institution has the potential to play a role such asWorld Trade Organization (WTO)in the field of economics orInternational Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)in the nuclear field, but with a focus on the governance of artificial intelligence.

Opportunities for Regulatory Harmonization

The existence of a global body can accelerate the harmonization of cross-border regulations, thereby facilitating collaboration in research and innovation. This can also provide legal certainty for AI startups that have faced regulatory differences across regions.

In addition, transparency in algorithm monitoring could increase, thereby strengthening public trust in AI-based systems. This is important in the midst of increasing concerns about algorithmic bias and the misuse of personal data.

Risk of politicization and power imbalance

Nevertheless, some analysts warn that such a body could become an arena for the power struggle among the major powers. Without the principles of transparency and independence, that organization could lose legitimacy in the eyes of the public.

The issue of representation is also an important challenge: developing countries must have a balanced voice so that they are not merely spectators in shaping global AI policy.

In the end, the proposalGlobal AI AgencyFrom China, it reflects the country's ambition to play a leading role in shaping the future of world technology. Whether this initiative will be received as a collaborative solution or viewed as Beijing's strategic move to expand its influence will still be determined by the diplomatic dynamics in the years to come.

For readers who are interested in similar issues, also read the report.InseminationRegarding AI policy in Europe and the United States' efforts to strengthen algorithmic oversight in the public sector.